Taylor v Attorney-General (Cth)Citation:[2019] HCA 30Before:Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon, Edelman JJDate:11 Sep 2019Case Number:M36/2018Read more
Section 268.121(2) of the Criminal Code expresses a contrary intention for the purposes of s 13(a) of the Crimes Act 1914, precluding private prosecution for offences under Division 268 without the written consent of the Attorney-General.
- Parties
- Applicant: Private Citizen; Respondent: Attorney-General
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Private Prosecution, Consent of Attorney General, Crimes Against Humanity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Private Citizen
Applicant
Attorney-General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a private citizen can commence a prosecution for a crime against humanity under s 268.11 of the Criminal Code without the written consent of the Attorney-General
- 2 Whether s 268.121(2) of the Criminal Code precludes private prosecution for offences under Division 268
- 3 Whether s 268.121(2) expresses a contrary intention for the purposes of s 13(a) of the Crimes Act 1914
Ratio Decidendi
Section 268.121(2) of the Criminal Code expresses a contrary intention for the purposes of s 13(a) of the Crimes Act 1914, precluding private prosecution for offences under Division 268 without the written consent of the Attorney-General.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Private prosecution for offences under Division 268 of the Criminal Code without the written consent of the Attorney-General is not permitted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment