Private R Army v Chief of Army [2021] ADFDAT 2
Having regard to the affidavit, submissions and revised draft minutes of order, the Tribunal was satisfied that it had power, including by implication, to make the revised orders, and that a public interest justified suppression of the Appellant's name; the amended draft orders were therefore made.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal in the Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal / Interlocutory Orders for Non Publication, Non Disclosure and Pseudonyms Before the Appeal Hearing
- Outcome
- Orders made in the form of the amended draft, to operate until the sitting at which the appeal hearing is listed and subject to any further order.
- Legal Topics
- ['defence Force Discipline Appeal' 'non Publication Orders' 'non Disclosure Orders' 'pseudonym Orders' 'special Operations Command Information']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal in the Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal / Interlocutory Orders for Non Publication, Non Disclosure and Pseudonyms Before the Appeal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal had power, including by implication, to make the proposed non-publication, non-disclosure and pseudonym orders.' "Whether public interest justified suppression of the Appellant's name and restrictions on information concerning Special Operations Command."]
Ratio Decidendi
Having regard to the affidavit, submissions and revised draft minutes of order, the Tribunal was satisfied that it had power, including by implication, to make the revised orders, and that a public interest justified suppression of the Appellant's name; the amended draft orders were therefore made.
Court Disposition
Orders made in the form of the amended draft, to operate until the sitting at which the appeal hearing is listed and subject to any further order.
Orders
- ['In relation to the proceedings of the Tribunal at this sitting, and until the sitting at which the appeal hearing is listed, and subject to any further order, the Tribunal makes the orders in Annexure A.' 'There be no publication or disclosure of the name of the Appellant, or any personnel who serve, or have...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment