Cahill v Rhodes/Rhodes v Cahill [2002] NSWSC 561
The court was not satisfied the presumption of revocation by destruction of the lost Will was rebutted, given changing relationships and uncertainties, and thus found the deceased died intestate with Letters of Administration to be granted to his mother.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Dispute / Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Deceased died intestate; Grant of Letters of Administration to his mother; Proceedings seeking probate of earlier Will dismissed; Costs paid from estate.
- Legal Topics
- ['probate of a Lost Will' "presumption of Destruction on Testator's Death" 'effect of Section 18 a Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898' 'evidence for Probate of Lost Will' 'payment of Costs in Probate Suits']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Probate Dispute / Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the deceased's lost 1999 Will should be admitted to probate" 'Whether the presumption of destruction with intent to revoke is rebutted' 'Entitlement to grant of Letters of Administration upon intestacy']
Ratio Decidendi
The court was not satisfied the presumption of revocation by destruction of the lost Will was rebutted, given changing relationships and uncertainties, and thus found the deceased died intestate with Letters of Administration to be granted to his mother.
Court Disposition
Deceased died intestate; Grant of Letters of Administration to his mother; Proceedings seeking probate of earlier Will dismissed; Costs paid from estate.
Orders
- ['Declare that Daniel John Cahill died on 11 April 2000, intestate.' 'Grant Letters of Administration to Robyn Denise Cahill, subject to compliance with Rules of Court.' 'Proceedings 105651 of 2001 dismissed.' 'Costs of plaintiff and defendant in each proceeding be paid out of estate.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment