Saraceni v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2013] FCAFC 42

Saraceni v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2013] FCAFC 42

The power exercised by ASIC in authorising a person as an eligible applicant for examination under s 596A of the Corporations Act does not attract an obligation of procedural fairness to potential examinees as it does not directly affect their rights or interests; therefore, the challenge to ASIC’s decision fails and summary judgment was correctly granted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 May 2013
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal From Summary Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'examinations Under Corporations Act' 'summary Dismissal' 'asic Powers']
['administrative Law' 'corporations Law' 'practice and Procedure'] ['procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'examinations Under Corporations Act' 'summary Dismissal' 'asic Powers']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal From Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether a potential examinee is entitled to procedural fairness in ASIC's decision to authorise applicants for examination under s 596A of the Corporations Act" 'Whether ASIC failed to take into account relevant considerations or took into account irrelevant considerations in authorising eligible applicants']

Ratio Decidendi

The power exercised by ASIC in authorising a person as an eligible applicant for examination under s 596A of the Corporations Act does not attract an obligation of procedural fairness to potential examinees as it does not directly affect their rights or interests; therefore, the challenge to ASIC’s decision fails and summary judgment was correctly granted.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal be granted.' 'The appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant/appellant pay the respondents' costs of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal."]