Project 28 v Barr (No 3) [2007] NSWSC 826

Project 28 v Barr (No 3) [2007] NSWSC 826

The delay in delivery of consent orders was caused by unavoidable communication difficulties between parties; therefore, it is inappropriate to call upon legal representatives to show cause regarding personal liability for costs under s 99 Civil Procedure Act 2005.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 July 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Determination
Outcome
No orders made.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'consent Orders' 'personal Liability for Costs']
['procedure'] ['costs' 'consent Orders' 'personal Liability for Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Costs Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether legal representatives should be called upon to show cause why they should not pay costs personally under the Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 99']

Ratio Decidendi

The delay in delivery of consent orders was caused by unavoidable communication difficulties between parties; therefore, it is inappropriate to call upon legal representatives to show cause regarding personal liability for costs under s 99 Civil Procedure Act 2005.

Court Disposition

No orders made.

Orders

  • []