Re Horvarth & Anor Ex Parte Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1998] FCA 1431
Leave to file the application was refused as the matters raised had already been determined by the Court on multiple occasions; the application was held to be an abuse of process and clearly foredoomed to fail.
- Parties
- Applicant Debtor: Gabor Horvath (Senior); Applicant Debtor: Agota Horvath; Respondent Judgment Creditor: Commonwealth Bank of Australia
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Motion for Leave to File Application
- Outcome
- leave to file application refused; motion dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Proof of Debt, Abuse of Process, Leave to File Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gabor Horvath (Senior)
Applicant Debtor
Agota Horvath
Applicant Debtor
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Respondent Judgment Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Motion for Leave to File Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to file an application challenging the proof of debt admitted by the trustee in bankruptcy
- 2 Whether the matters raised have previously been raised and determined by the Court
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to file the application was refused as the matters raised had already been determined by the Court on multiple occasions; the application was held to be an abuse of process and clearly foredoomed to fail.
Court Disposition
leave to file application refused; motion dismissed with costs
Orders
- Leave is refused to file the application the subject of the applicants' motion filed on 6 November 1998 and the Registrar is directed to refuse to accept such application.
- The applicants' motion filed on 6 November 1998 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment