Tresedar Pty Limited & Ors v Property Builders (Constructions) Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 1575
The plaintiff has a reasonable cause of action if its claim for an oral contract succeeds. Issues of fact and law (including estoppel and statutory compliance) are not appropriate for summary determination and require a full trial. The Notice of Motion for summary dismissal is refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Summary Dismissal Application
- Outcome
- Notice of Motion for summary dismissal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['summary Dismissal' 'breach of Contract' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Summary Dismissal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the statement of claim discloses no reasonable cause of action warranting summary dismissal under r 13.4 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005' 'Whether the oral contract claim is unenforceable under Home Building Act 1989' 'Whether estoppel or previous judgment bars the claims']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff has a reasonable cause of action if its claim for an oral contract succeeds. Issues of fact and law (including estoppel and statutory compliance) are not appropriate for summary determination and require a full trial. The Notice of Motion for summary dismissal is refused.
Court Disposition
Notice of Motion for summary dismissal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Notice of Motion for summary dismissal is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment