Property Partnerships Pacific v Woollahra Council (No 2) [2006] NSWLEC 765
The proposal is worthy of approval on its merits, subject to obtaining a necessary drainage easement under s40 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, with resolution of issues concerning trees by compromise transplanting and adoption of certain suggested conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'drainage Easement' 'section 40 Land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether proposal can be approved without a downstream drainage easement' 'Whether one, two or none of the Canary Date Palms should be transplanted elsewhere on the site' 'Whether suggestions for design changes by planning expert should be adopted' "Whether the objectors' concerns are valid"]
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal is worthy of approval on its merits, subject to obtaining a necessary drainage easement under s40 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, with resolution of issues concerning trees by compromise transplanting and adoption of certain suggested conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development application to demolish an existing residential flat building and erect a new residential flat building containing two dwellings over basement parking on lot 30 DP 590068, 10 Annandale Street, Darling Point, is granted subject to agreed conditions.' 'The exhibits are returned...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment