R v HOSKINS [2020] NSWDC 315
The offender's conduct across five offences was part of a single, violent course of conduct, displaying mid-range to below mid-range objective seriousness. Sentences were determined by the gravity of offences, prior criminal history, lack of remorse, and need for community protection. Aggregate sentencing was appropriate as offences were connected, with indicative sentences reflecting individual seriousness, leading to an aggregate custodial term.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- conviction and aggregate custodial sentence
- Legal Topics
- ['property Offences' 'violent Offences' 'public Order Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['objective seriousness of reckless wounding' 'assessment of affray' 'seriousness of assault occasioning actual bodily harm' 'aggravated break and enter with intent to commit serious indictable offence' 'appropriate sentencing outcome']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender's conduct across five offences was part of a single, violent course of conduct, displaying mid-range to below mid-range objective seriousness. Sentences were determined by the gravity of offences, prior criminal history, lack of remorse, and need for community protection. Aggregate sentencing was appropriate as offences were connected, with indicative sentences reflecting individual seriousness, leading to an aggregate custodial term.
Court Disposition
conviction and aggregate custodial sentence
Orders
- ['The offender is convicted of five offences.' 'In respect of assault occasioning actual bodily harm (sequence 9), conviction recorded but no further penalty imposed under s10A.' 'Indicative sentences: s35(4) reckless wounding (sequence 11) - 3 years; s35(4) reckless wounding (sequence 12) - 3 years; s93C affray...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment