PropTech Group Limited, in the matter of PropTech Group Limited (No 2) [2023] FCA 89
The Scheme was approved because the evidence established compliance with the convening orders and statutory and procedural requirements, satisfaction of the statutory majorities under s 411(4)(a), satisfaction or waiver of relevant conditions precedent other than court approval, ASIC's statement of no objection under s 411(17)(b), full disclosure in the Scheme Booklet, overwhelming member support, independent expert support, director recommendations, no oppression or public policy concern, and that the Scheme was made in good faith and was fair and reasonable. The minor exhibit reference error in the convening orders was immaterial and caused no injustice, so it did not invalidate the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Scheme of Arrangement Proceeding / Second Court Hearing for Approval of Scheme of Arrangement
- Outcome
- Scheme of arrangement approved and exemption from compliance with s 411(11) granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['scheme of Arrangement' 'shareholder Approval' 'court Approval Under S 411(4)(b)' 'exemption From S 411(11) Compliance' 'procedural Irregularity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Scheme of Arrangement Proceeding / Second Court Hearing for Approval of Scheme of Arrangement
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the scheme of arrangement between PropTech Group Limited and holders of ordinary shares should be approved under s 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether PropTech Group Limited should be exempted under s 411(12) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) from compliance with s 411(11).' 'Whether a minor error in the convening orders invalidated the steps taken by PropTech Group Limited.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Scheme was approved because the evidence established compliance with the convening orders and statutory and procedural requirements, satisfaction of the statutory majorities under s 411(4)(a), satisfaction or waiver of relevant conditions precedent other than court approval, ASIC's statement of no objection under s 411(17)(b), full disclosure in the Scheme Booklet, overwhelming member support, independent expert support, director recommendations, no oppression or public policy concern, and that the Scheme was made in good faith and was fair and reasonable. The minor exhibit reference error in the convening orders was immaterial and caused no injustice, so it did not invalidate the...
Court Disposition
Scheme of arrangement approved and exemption from compliance with s 411(11) granted.
Orders
- ['Under s 411(4)(b) of the Act, the Scheme is approved.' 'Under s 411(12) of the Act, the plaintiff is exempted from compliance with section 411(11) of the Act in respect of the Scheme.' 'These orders are to be entered forthwith.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment