CIM15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 490

CIM15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 490

None of the grounds of appeal were substantiated; the Tribunal and the Federal Circuit Court did not commit jurisdictional error, nor was bias or failure to hear evidence established; statutory requirements for notification and review were followed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 March 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court to Federal Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'notification of Tribunal Hearings' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'notification of Tribunal Hearings' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court to Federal Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Federal Circuit Court's dismissal of the review application for protection visas involved error" 'Whether the Tribunal complied with statutory obligations regarding notification and hearing' "Whether there was jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's process" 'Whether grounds of bias or failure to hear evidence were established']

Ratio Decidendi

None of the grounds of appeal were substantiated; the Tribunal and the Federal Circuit Court did not commit jurisdictional error, nor was bias or failure to hear evidence established; statutory requirements for notification and review were followed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellants are to pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal."]