MZXEN v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 829
Leave to raise new points on appeal was refused because the grounds did not have a reasonable prospect of success and there was no acceptable explanation for not raising them below; consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visas' 'refugee Status' 'judicial Review' 'grounds of Appeal' 'leave to Raise New Arguments on Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Federal Magistrate erred by failing to find that the Tribunal erred regarding the second appellant's membership of a social group" 'Whether the Federal Magistrate erred by failing to find that the Tribunal failed to consider whether the second appellant suffered persecution for a convention reason' 'Whether the Federal Magistrate erred by failing to find that the Tribunal failed to consider whether the first appellant suffered persecution for a convention reason' 'Whether leave should be granted to raise points on appeal not advanced below']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to raise new points on appeal was refused because the grounds did not have a reasonable prospect of success and there was no acceptable explanation for not raising them below; consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment