Prothonotary v Wilson [1999] NSWSC 1115

Prothonotary v Wilson [1999] NSWSC 1115

Fixed term sentences were imposed for contempt because the defendant showed no contrition, insight into the criminality of his conduct, or respect for the Court, making parole or supervised release inappropriate.

Parties
Applicant: Prothonotary; Respondent: John Wilson
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 November 1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
fixed term sentences of imprisonment imposed for contempt
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Sentencing
Criminal Law Contempt of Court Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Prothonotary

Applicant

John Wilson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether fixed term sentences should be imposed for contempt instead of parole
  2. 2 Role of defendant's contrition and attitude in sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

Fixed term sentences were imposed for contempt because the defendant showed no contrition, insight into the criminality of his conduct, or respect for the Court, making parole or supervised release inappropriate.

Court Disposition

fixed term sentences of imprisonment imposed for contempt

Orders

  • Fixed term sentences imposed for two offences of contempt; no possibility of parole