Provelop Group Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2021] NSWLEC 1278
The Court upheld the appeal and granted consent because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed approval of the amended development application subject to conditions was a decision the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, having regard to the relevant statutory and planning controls and the absence of any jurisdictional impediment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application Da/393/2020 / Final Orders Following S 34 AA Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'deemed Refusal Appeal' 'attached Dual Occupancy' 'amended Plans' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders' 'basix' 'vegetation Clearing' 'contamination' 'acid Sulfate Soils' 'earthworks']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application Da/393/2020 / Final Orders Following S 34 AA Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the amended development application for demolition of existing structures and construction of a three-storey attached dual occupancy at 159 Duncan Street, Maroubra should be approved.' "Whether the parties' agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether relevant planning controls and statutory preconditions, including owner consent, contamination, BASIX, vegetation, zoning, height, floor space ratio, acid sulfate soils, earthworks and amenity impacts, supported the grant of consent.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court upheld the appeal and granted consent because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed approval of the amended development application subject to conditions was a decision the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, having regard to the relevant statutory and planning controls and the absence of any jurisdictional impediment.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Consent is granted to Development Application for demolition of existing structures and construction of a 3-storey attached dual occupancy, basement car parking, roof top terrace, landscaping and associated works at 159 Duncan Street, Maroubra subject to conditions set out in Annexure A.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment