Provincial Planning Pty Limited v Ku-ring-gai Council [2005] NSWLEC 188
Because the parties settled the matter in its entirety, the Court granted consent orders giving effect to their agreement and modified the existing development consent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under S 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of a Modification Application / Ex Tempore Judgment; Consent Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Consent 1795/01 modified; no order for costs; exhibits other than Exhibit A returned.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' 'consent Orders' 'underground Parking' 'parking Provision' 's 94 Contributions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under S 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of a Modification Application / Ex Tempore Judgment; Consent Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Development Consent 1795/01 should be modified following refusal of the modification application by Ku-ring-gai Council' 'Creation of additional underground parking on the site' 'Adequacy of parking provision' 'Payment of s 94 contributions in lieu of provision of parking spaces']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties settled the matter in its entirety, the Court granted consent orders giving effect to their agreement and modified the existing development consent.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Consent 1795/01 modified; no order for costs; exhibits other than Exhibit A returned.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld;' 'Development Consent 1795/01 for the erection of a part four and part five storey commercial building with basement car parking at 741 Pacific Highway, Gordon (being Lot 1 DP 120856) is modified pursuant to s 96(6) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 with such development...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment