In the matter of Colorado Products Pty Ltd (in prov liq) [2014] NSWSC 64
Leave to conduct derivative proceedings in the name of a company in provisional liquidation requires an adequately robust indemnity protecting the company's estate against the risk of an adverse costs order. The indemnity offered by HY International was insufficient, as it did not secure costs for the entire proceedings, could be terminated unilaterally, and was not supported by sufficient assets. Therefore, leave to prosecute in the company's name was refused and the interlocutory process dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Dismissal of Interlocutory Process for Leave to Continue and Prosecute Existing Proceedings in the Name of Provisional Liquidator
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' interlocutory application dismissed; Plaintiffs to pay costs of the application.
- Legal Topics
- ['provisional Liquidation' 'derivative Action' 'leave to Prosecute in Company Name' 'indemnity for Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Dismissal of Interlocutory Process for Leave to Continue and Prosecute Existing Proceedings in the Name of Provisional Liquidator
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should grant leave under its inherent jurisdiction for HY International to continue and prosecute proceedings in the name of Colorado Products Pty Ltd (in prov liq)' 'Whether the liquidator and company are adequately protected financially by means of indemnity']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to conduct derivative proceedings in the name of a company in provisional liquidation requires an adequately robust indemnity protecting the company's estate against the risk of an adverse costs order. The indemnity offered by HY International was insufficient, as it did not secure costs for the entire proceedings, could be terminated unilaterally, and was not supported by sufficient assets. Therefore, leave to prosecute in the company's name was refused and the interlocutory process dismissed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' interlocutory application dismissed; Plaintiffs to pay costs of the application.
Orders
- ["The Plaintiffs' Interlocutory Process filed on 31 January 2014 be dismissed." 'The Plaintiffs pay the costs of the application as agreed or as assessed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment