Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union of New South Wales dispute with the Royal Botanic Gardens [2000] NSWIRComm 197
The substantial nature and principal purpose of the Property Co-ordinator role were managing and coordinating building construction, maintenance programs and property services, not horticultural work. The horticultural award classifications required horticultural experience or qualifications, while the position description required facilities management, building codes, OH&S, purchasing, accounting, budgeting, engineering and building construction knowledge and no horticultural qualifications. The position had historically been covered by the clerical award, the added duties did not substantially change its nature or responsibility, and cross-award or informal reporting lines did not...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Notification of Industrial Dispute Under Section 130 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Decision and Recommendation After Unsuccessful Compulsory Conference and Conciliation
- Outcome
- The Commission recommended that the Property Co-ordinator position be covered by the clerical award and that the parties implement the decision.
- Legal Topics
- ['award Coverage' 'classification of Property Co Ordinator Position' 'job Evaluation' 'clerical Award Versus Horticultural Award']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notification of Industrial Dispute Under Section 130 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Decision and Recommendation After Unsuccessful Compulsory Conference and Conciliation
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Which of the competing awards applied to the position of Property Co-ordinator at the Royal Botanic Gardens.' 'Whether the position was covered by the Crown Employees (Administrative and Clerical Officers Salaries) Award or the Crown Employees (Parks and Gardens - Horticulture and Rangers Staff) Consent Award 1998.']
Ratio Decidendi
The substantial nature and principal purpose of the Property Co-ordinator role were managing and coordinating building construction, maintenance programs and property services, not horticultural work. The horticultural award classifications required horticultural experience or qualifications, while the position description required facilities management, building codes, OH&S, purchasing, accounting, budgeting, engineering and building construction knowledge and no horticultural qualifications. The position had historically been covered by the clerical award, the added duties did not substantially change its nature or responsibility, and cross-award or informal reporting lines did not...
Court Disposition
The Commission recommended that the Property Co-ordinator position be covered by the clerical award and that the parties implement the decision.
Orders
- ['That the position of Property Co-ordinator, Royal Botanic Gardens is appropriately correctly covered by the terms and conditions of the Crown Employees (Administrative and Clerical Officers - Salaries) Award.' 'The parties take such steps as are necessary to implement the conclusions determined by this decision.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment