PULEO v CORRA [1995] NSWCA 382
Due to difficulty in obtaining a certified copy of the judgment, but to prevent unnecessary delay and ensure fairness to both parties, the time for filing a notice of appeal is extended for three weeks; costs to be the respondent's costs in the appeal unless the appeal is not pursued.
- Parties
- Applicant: Puleo; Respondent: Corra
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Determination of Application
- Outcome
- Time for filing notice of appeal extended; costs ordered as respondent's costs in the appeal unless appeal not pursued.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time for Appeal, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Puleo
Applicant
Corra
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Determination of Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether time for filing the notice of appeal should be extended.
- 2 Whether costs of the application should follow the event.
Ratio Decidendi
Due to difficulty in obtaining a certified copy of the judgment, but to prevent unnecessary delay and ensure fairness to both parties, the time for filing a notice of appeal is extended for three weeks; costs to be the respondent's costs in the appeal unless the appeal is not pursued.
Court Disposition
Time for filing notice of appeal extended; costs ordered as respondent's costs in the appeal unless appeal not pursued.
Orders
- Time for filing notice of appeal extended to 17 July 1995.
- Costs of the application to be the respondent's costs in the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment