PATTON v HARRISON [NO 2] [1989] NSWCA 162
The Court found it appropriate, having regard to the apologies and circumstances, to make orders dissolving interlocutory orders and discharging the warrant, but insisted on the payment of costs by the contemnor as recognition of the public and private expense incurred in upholding the Court's process.
- Parties
- Claimant: Patton; First Opponent: Australian Consolidated Press Limited; Second Opponent: Vivienne Roslyn Harrison
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Proceedings / Orders Following Application to Purge Contempt
- Outcome
- Orders made by consent: interlocutory orders dissolved, warrant discharged, costs awarded, passport conditionally released, summons and motion dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Purging Contempt, Costs, Court Process Enforcement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patton
Claimant
Australian Consolidated Press Limited
First Opponent
Vivienne Roslyn Harrison
Second Opponent
Procedural Posture
Contempt Proceedings / Orders Following Application to Purge Contempt
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Harrison's contempt is purged by apologies and proposed orders
- 2 Appropriateness of dissolving previous orders and discharging arrest warrant
- 3 Liability for costs arising from enforcement of court process
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found it appropriate, having regard to the apologies and circumstances, to make orders dissolving interlocutory orders and discharging the warrant, but insisted on the payment of costs by the contemnor as recognition of the public and private expense incurred in upholding the Court's process.
Court Disposition
Orders made by consent: interlocutory orders dissolved, warrant discharged, costs awarded, passport conditionally released, summons and motion dismissed.
Orders
- Australian Consolidated Press Limited added as first opponent.
- Second opponent to pay claimant's costs ($7,771) by 20 October 1989 to Landers, O'Reilly and Co.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment