PWB Anchor Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing & Kindred Industries Union (No 2) [2000] FCA 1491

PWB Anchor Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing & Kindred Industries Union (No 2) [2000] FCA 1491

There is a serious question to be tried whether the bans on loading trucks, commenced on 17 October 2000, are covered by the notices dated 11 September 2000 given the lapse of time and intervening actions; accordingly, interlocutory injunctive relief restraining such bans based on those notices is justified. However, the notices of indefinite strike commencing 23 October 2000 were valid and provided the necessary statutory notice; no extension or interference with the commencement date is warranted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 October 2000
Procedural Posture
Industrial Law Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory (injunction) Reasons for Judgment
Outcome
Interlocutory injunction granted in part; orders made restraining industrial action in the nature of bans on loading trucks pursuant to 11 September 2000 notices; other relief refused.
Legal Topics
['strike Action' 'industrial Action' 'injunctions' 'protected Action' 'notice Requirements Under Workplace Relations Act 1996']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Industrial Law Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory (injunction) Reasons for Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether bans on loading of trucks are protected industrial action under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)' 'Whether the lapse of time between notice and industrial action removes protection' 'Whether the applicant had sufficient notice to take defensive action before proposed indefinite strike' 'Balance of convenience in granting injunctive relief']

Ratio Decidendi

There is a serious question to be tried whether the bans on loading trucks, commenced on 17 October 2000, are covered by the notices dated 11 September 2000 given the lapse of time and intervening actions; accordingly, interlocutory injunctive relief restraining such bans based on those notices is justified. However, the notices of indefinite strike commencing 23 October 2000 were valid and provided the necessary statutory notice; no extension or interference with the commencement date is warranted.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory injunction granted in part; orders made restraining industrial action in the nature of bans on loading trucks pursuant to 11 September 2000 notices; other relief refused.

Orders

  • ['Pending trial or further order, respondents and their agents are restrained from taking, continuing or threatening any industrial action (or advising, inducing, or procuring any employee to do so) in the nature of bans on loading trucks or dispatching product under or in reliance on the 11 September 2000 notices.'...