Qantas Airways Ltd v Lucinda Holdforth [2015] NSWSC 821
Because the parties had reached agreement on an interim regime and there was no dispute presently before the Court requiring determination, it was not appropriate to read the affidavit tendered by the defendant for contextual purposes. The affidavit of Anthony Roger O'Reilly was therefore not read at that stage.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for an Injunction Restraining Disclosure of Confidential Information / Interlocutory Hearing Concerning an Agreed Interim Regime and an Application to Read an Affidavit
- Outcome
- Interim injunction extended; affidavit not read
- Legal Topics
- ['interim Injunction' 'consent Orders' 'affidavit Evidence' 'suppression or Non Publication of Affidavit Contents']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for an Injunction Restraining Disclosure of Confidential Information / Interlocutory Hearing Concerning an Agreed Interim Regime and an Application to Read an Affidavit
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether, after the parties reached agreement on an interim regime, the defendant should be permitted to read the affidavit of Anthony Roger O'Reilly sworn on 24 June 2015." "Whether there should be disclosure or publication of the contents of the affidavit of Anthony Roger O'Reilly sworn on 24 June 2015."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties had reached agreement on an interim regime and there was no dispute presently before the Court requiring determination, it was not appropriate to read the affidavit tendered by the defendant for contextual purposes. The affidavit of Anthony Roger O'Reilly was therefore not read at that stage.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction extended; affidavit not read
Orders
- ['Upon the plaintiff by its counsel giving the usual undertaking as to damages, orders in paragraphs 1 to 4 inclusive in the Short Minutes of Order initialled by the Court and dated 24 June 2015 were made.' 'Liberty in paragraph 5 of the Short Minutes of Order was granted.' "Until further order, there be no...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment