QE and anor v Macquarie University [2008] NSWADT 144
The applicants did not prove that QF's information was obtained from University files or disclosed by conduct for which Macquarie University was responsible; competing inferences remained available and the Tribunal could not speculate. Ms O'Brien's disclosure that QF had made a privacy complaint was a reasonable step in the statutory review process and was permitted or consented to for the purposes of investigating the complaint. The University had reasonable safeguards in place and the evidence did not justify ordering further measures. QF's academic records accurately recorded the outcomes actually awarded, so they were not to be amended, although section 15 may permit a statement to be...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 Proceedings; Principal Matter / Decision on Review in the NSW Administrative Decisions Tribunal, General Division
- Outcome
- In proceeding 053179, the decision under review was set aside in part concerning the section 15 application and a substituted determination was made that the recorded grades or outcomes remain unchanged; otherwise the decisions under review were affirmed, the review time was held reasonable, and no costs order was...
- Legal Topics
- ['information Protection Principles' 'personal Information' 'unauthorised Disclosure' 'adequate Safeguards' 'amendment of Records' 'internal Review Delay' 'costs in Tribunal Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 Proceedings; Principal Matter / Decision on Review in the NSW Administrative Decisions Tribunal, General Division
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether personal information concerning QF was obtained from Macquarie University records and disclosed to a third party's solicitors in breach of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998." "Whether Ms O'Brien's disclosure to Mr Long that QF had lodged a privacy complaint was a breach of privacy." 'Whether Macquarie University had adequate safeguards in place to protect personal information from unauthorised access, use and disclosure.' "Whether QF's academic records should be amended under section 15 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998." 'Whether the time taken by the respondent to determine the internal review was reasonable.' "Whether costs should be awarded against the applicants for QF's non-attendance for cross-examination on 14 June 2007."]
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants did not prove that QF's information was obtained from University files or disclosed by conduct for which Macquarie University was responsible; competing inferences remained available and the Tribunal could not speculate. Ms O'Brien's disclosure that QF had made a privacy complaint was a reasonable step in the statutory review process and was permitted or consented to for the purposes of investigating the complaint. The University had reasonable safeguards in place and the evidence did not justify ordering further measures. QF's academic records accurately recorded the outcomes actually awarded, so they were not to be amended, although section 15 may permit a statement to be...
Court Disposition
In proceeding 053179, the decision under review was set aside in part concerning the section 15 application and a substituted determination was made that the recorded grades or outcomes remain unchanged; otherwise the decisions under review were affirmed, the review time was held reasonable, and no costs order was...
Orders
- ['In relation to proceedings 053179 (QF v Macquarie University): The decision under review is set aside insofar as it considers the application made pursuant to section 15 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 and a determination that the recorded grades or outcomes for courses EDUC 106, TEP...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment