Qiao, Qi v Chen, Yuan Feng & Ors [1997] FCA 1580
The strike out application failed because the evidence could enable a court at trial to conclude that the applicant had been issued a sealed share certificate and allotted shares, and Re Independent Quarries Pty Limited supported standing in closely analogous circumstances; therefore the respondents did not show that the applicant's s 260 claim was manifestly untenable.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Law Proceeding; Application to Strike Out Parts of the Statement of Claim Seeking Relief Under S 260 of the Corporations Law / Interlocutory Strike Out Application Under Federal Court Rules O 16 R 11
- Outcome
- Strike out application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['strike Out Application' 'standing Under S 260 of the Corporations Law' 'company Membership' 'share Certificates and Share Register']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Law Proceeding; Application to Strike Out Parts of the Statement of Claim Seeking Relief Under S 260 of the Corporations Law / Interlocutory Strike Out Application Under Federal Court Rules O 16 R 11
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant's claim for relief under s 260 of the Corporations Law was so manifestly untenable that it could not succeed." "Whether a person whose name is not entered on the company's share register may have standing as a member where a share certificate in that person's name was sealed by the company and given to him."]
Ratio Decidendi
The strike out application failed because the evidence could enable a court at trial to conclude that the applicant had been issued a sealed share certificate and allotted shares, and Re Independent Quarries Pty Limited supported standing in closely analogous circumstances; therefore the respondents did not show that the applicant's s 260 claim was manifestly untenable.
Court Disposition
Strike out application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The first and second respondents pay the applicant's costs of the strikeout application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment