Wang v Minister For Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1313
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant said nothing in support of the grounds alleging procedural error or errors of law, the Court could discern no jurisdictional error by the Tribunal, and the Federal Magistrate correctly understood the position so that no error was revealed in his judgment.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Appeal Against Dismissal of an Application for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['student Visa' 'visa Cancellation' 'migration Review Tribunal' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'jurisdictional Error']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Appeal Against Dismissal of an Application for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal failed to observe procedures required by law.' "Whether the Tribunal's decision involved errors of law." 'Whether the operation of the Migration Act 1958 and the Migration Regulations 1994 rendered the appellant a victim of flawed law such that the Tribunal made a jurisdictional error.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant said nothing in support of the grounds alleging procedural error or errors of law, the Court could discern no jurisdictional error by the Tribunal, and the Federal Magistrate correctly understood the position so that no error was revealed in his judgment.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment