Hammond v Quayeyeware Pty Ltd, in the matter of Quayeyeware Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 2207
The plaintiffs were denied information as directors to which they were entitled and had to institute proceedings for access; the defendant failed to justify its position and ultimately provided the information sought, and as such, should bear the costs of the proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Corporate Dispute / Final Orders After Resolution of Substantive Dispute
- Outcome
- Proceeding dismissed by consent; costs awarded to plaintiffs.
- Legal Topics
- ["directors' Right of Access" 'costs' 'corporate Governance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporate Dispute / Final Orders After Resolution of Substantive Dispute
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Are directors entitled to unfettered access to company information?' 'Should costs be awarded when a proceeding is dismissed by consent after the relief is effectively achieved?']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs were denied information as directors to which they were entitled and had to institute proceedings for access; the defendant failed to justify its position and ultimately provided the information sought, and as such, should bear the costs of the proceedings.
Court Disposition
Proceeding dismissed by consent; costs awarded to plaintiffs.
Orders
- ['By consent, the proceeding is dismissed.' "The costs of the plaintiffs' interlocutory application filed on 28 August 2019 are costs in the proceeding." "The defendant shall pay the plaintiffs' costs of the proceeding."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment