Queanbeyan City Council v ACTEW Corporation Ltd [2011] HCA 40
Because of the extensive statutory control exercised by the Territory over ACTEW, ACTEW does not have an independent will. Therefore, impositions such as water licence fees and the utilities tax levied on ACTEW by the Territory are internal financial arrangements and not duties of excise or taxes for the purposes of s 90 of the Constitution.
- Parties
- Appellant: Queanbeyan City Council; First Respondent: ACTEW Corporation Ltd; Second Respondent: Australian Capital Territory
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Law Appeal / High Court of Australia on Appeal From Full Court of the Federal Court
- Outcome
- appeals dismissed; orders as to costs varied
- Legal Topics
- Duties of Excise, Territory Owned Corporations, Water Licence Fees, Utilities Tax
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Queanbeyan City Council
Appellant
ACTEW Corporation Ltd
First Respondent
Australian Capital Territory
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Law Appeal / High Court of Australia on Appeal From Full Court of the Federal Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the water licence fees and utilities tax imposed by the Australian Capital Territory on ACTEW constitute duties of excise within the meaning of s 90 of the Constitution
- 2 Whether ACTEW is so closely identified with the Territory that exactions imposed upon it are only internal financial arrangements and not 'taxes' within the constitutional context
Ratio Decidendi
Because of the extensive statutory control exercised by the Territory over ACTEW, ACTEW does not have an independent will. Therefore, impositions such as water licence fees and the utilities tax levied on ACTEW by the Territory are internal financial arrangements and not duties of excise or taxes for the purposes of s 90 of the Constitution.
Court Disposition
appeals dismissed; orders as to costs varied
Orders
- Set aside sub-paragraphs 8(a) and 8(b) of the Full Federal Court order of 29 October 2010; each party to bear its own costs of the appeal and cross-appeal in the Full Court, and otherwise appeals dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment