Quickway Constructions Pty Ltd v Electrical Energy Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1140
The assignment of Electrical's contractual entitlements to Bibby did not prevent Electrical from serving payment claims or pursuing adjudication under the BCISPA because the Act creates a statutory entitlement in the contractor who undertook to carry out the construction work, and Electrical's statutory rights before crystallisation into a debt were personal and not assigned by the invoice notation. However, the Leichhardt adjudication determination involved a denial of natural justice because the adjudicator determined the application on the basis of a 31 March 2017 reference date when Electrical had identified 28 April 2017 as the relevant reference date and Quickway had expressly...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings Challenging Two Adjudication Determinations Under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (nsw) / Principal Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Quickway's challenge to the two adjudication determinations based on assignment failed; Quickway's challenge to the Leichhardt adjudication determination based on denial of natural justice succeeded; consequential orders were left for the parties to formulate.
- Legal Topics
- ['security of Payment' 'construction Contracts' 'progress Payments' 'assignment of Debts' 'payment Claims' 'adjudication Determinations' 'natural Justice' 'reference Date']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings Challenging Two Adjudication Determinations Under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (nsw) / Principal Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether assignment of Electrical Energy Pty Ltd's payment entitlements to Bibby meant the invoices were not payment claims and the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) procedure was unavailable to Electrical Energy Pty Ltd." 'Whether the adjudicator denied Quickway natural justice in the Leichhardt adjudication by determining the application on the basis of a 31 March 2017 reference date rather than the reference date addressed by Quickway.']
Ratio Decidendi
The assignment of Electrical's contractual entitlements to Bibby did not prevent Electrical from serving payment claims or pursuing adjudication under the BCISPA because the Act creates a statutory entitlement in the contractor who undertook to carry out the construction work, and Electrical's statutory rights before crystallisation into a debt were personal and not assigned by the invoice notation. However, the Leichhardt adjudication determination involved a denial of natural justice because the adjudicator determined the application on the basis of a 31 March 2017 reference date when Electrical had identified 28 April 2017 as the relevant reference date and Quickway had expressly...
Court Disposition
Quickway's challenge to the two adjudication determinations based on assignment failed; Quickway's challenge to the Leichhardt adjudication determination based on denial of natural justice succeeded; consequential orders were left for the parties to formulate.
Orders
- ['Order that the interlocutory injunction granted on 7 August 2017 be discharged.' 'Direct that within 28 days the plaintiff bring in orders giving effect to the conclusions I have reached in this judgment, or arrange with my Associate for the proceedings to be listed for argument on the proper form of such orders.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment