Nichols Global Enterprises Pty Limited -v- Biviano & Anor [2003] NSWADT 134

Nichols Global Enterprises Pty Limited -v- Biviano & Anor [2003] NSWADT 134

The building and car park were part of the retail shop used for the restaurant enterprise, and the toilets, stairway, air conditioning unit, garden and planter boxes were not properly excluded from the statutory lettable area. The lettable area was 1035 square metres, exceeding the 1,000 square metre limit in Section 5(a), so the Retail Leases Act did not apply and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 April 2003
Procedural Posture
Retail Lease Dispute / Jurisdiction; Principal Matter; Costs Application
Outcome
Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
['quiet Enjoyment' 'termination of Lease' 'costs' 'lettable Area' 'retail Shop Area Exclusion']
['retail Leases' 'tribunal Jurisdiction'] ['quiet Enjoyment' 'termination of Lease' 'costs' 'lettable Area' 'retail Shop Area Exclusion']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Retail Lease Dispute / Jurisdiction; Principal Matter; Costs Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the leased premises were a retail shop within the meaning of Section 3 of the Retail Leases Act.' 'Whether the building and car park formed part of the retail shop and the statutory lettable area.' 'Whether the retail shop was excluded from the operation of the Retail Leases Act by Section 5(a) because it had a lettable area of 1,000 square metres or more.' 'Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to entertain the application.']

Ratio Decidendi

The building and car park were part of the retail shop used for the restaurant enterprise, and the toilets, stairway, air conditioning unit, garden and planter boxes were not properly excluded from the statutory lettable area. The lettable area was 1035 square metres, exceeding the 1,000 square metre limit in Section 5(a), so the Retail Leases Act did not apply and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • ['Application Dismissed']