Quotila Pty Ltd v South Australian Marine Products Industries Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 29
Although the balance of convenience in terms of witness location favours transfer, this is insufficiently weighty when considered with the other identified matters; there is no sound reason to transfer the proceeding from South Australia to Western Australia. The application to transfer venue must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Hearing and Determination of Notice of Motion to Transfer Venue
- Outcome
- Defendants' notice of motion dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['transfer of Proceedings' 'venue' 'balance of Convenience']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Hearing and Determination of Notice of Motion to Transfer Venue
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Should the proceeding be transferred to the Western Australia District Registry under s 48(1) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)?']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the balance of convenience in terms of witness location favours transfer, this is insufficiently weighty when considered with the other identified matters; there is no sound reason to transfer the proceeding from South Australia to Western Australia. The application to transfer venue must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Defendants' notice of motion dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ["The defendants' notice of motion dated 19 January 2011 be dismissed." "The defendants pay the plaintiff's costs of the said notice of motion." 'The proceeding be listed for further directions on 9 May 2011 at 9.15 am.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment