QXZB v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 891
The application for an extension of time was dismissed as the applicant provided no good explanation for the delay and the underlying application lacked reasonable prospects of success, since the Tribunal had no power to extend the strict statutory time limits and no jurisdictional error was apparent.
- Parties
- Applicant: QXZB; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time for Judicial Review / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Judicial Review, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Time Limits for Review, Notification of Decision
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
QXZB
Applicant
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time for Judicial Review / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to apply for judicial review of the Tribunal's decision
- 2 Whether notification of a decision under s 501G(1) of the Migration Act can be given more than once for time limits under s 500(6B)
Ratio Decidendi
The application for an extension of time was dismissed as the applicant provided no good explanation for the delay and the underlying application lacked reasonable prospects of success, since the Tribunal had no power to extend the strict statutory time limits and no jurisdictional error was apparent.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time dismissed
Orders
- The application for an extension of time is dismissed.
- The applicant must pay the first respondent's costs of the application, to be assessed on a lump sum basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment