REGINA v R [2000] NSWCCA 212

REGINA v R [2000] NSWCCA 212

Although the applicant suffered from a serious depressive condition and was affected by drugs and alcohol, and although those matters warranted mitigation, the offences were extremely serious and toward the upper end of seriousness. The sentencing judge dealt fairly and sympathetically with the mitigating circumstances, made no error of fact or law, and imposed a sentence within the appropriate range; the sentence was therefore not shown to be manifestly excessive.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 May 2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal Against Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal against sentence dismissed.
Legal Topics
['armed Robbery' 'discharging a Firearm in a Manner Likely to Endanger Life' 'common Assault' 'depression and Psychiatric Condition' 'guilty Plea' 'manifest Excess']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing' 'criminal Procedure'] ['armed Robbery' 'discharging a Firearm in a Manner Likely to Endanger Life' 'common Assault' 'depression and Psychiatric Condition' 'guilty Plea' 'manifest Excess']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal Against Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentence for armed robbery, firearm offending and common assault was manifestly excessive.' "Whether the sentencing judge gave insufficient allowance for the applicant's psychiatric condition, drug and alcohol use, hospital discharge circumstances and guilty plea."]

Ratio Decidendi

Although the applicant suffered from a serious depressive condition and was affected by drugs and alcohol, and although those matters warranted mitigation, the offences were extremely serious and toward the upper end of seriousness. The sentencing judge dealt fairly and sympathetically with the mitigating circumstances, made no error of fact or law, and imposed a sentence within the appropriate range; the sentence was therefore not shown to be manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal against sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal against sentence is granted.' 'The appeal against sentence is dismissed.']