Falcomata v Ku-ring-gai Council (No 3) [2005] NSWLEC 541
No evidentiary basis was established to warrant a departure from the application of the s 94 contributions plan; the full contribution as reflected in condition 79 is imposed. A costs order of $435 is appropriate for today's proceedings due to inadequate evidence leading to adjournment, subject to the concurrence of the Acting Chief Judge.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Proceedings (land and Environment) / Post Consent, Application for Variation of S 94 Contribution and Costs
- Outcome
- Application for variation of s 94 contribution dismissed; condition 79 imposed unvaried; partial costs order granted in favour of respondent for today's hearing, subject to judicial concurrence.
- Legal Topics
- ['developer Contributions' 'local Government Rates' 'costs Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Proceedings (land and Environment) / Post Consent, Application for Variation of S 94 Contribution and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the s 94 contribution under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 should be varied or disallowed for Lot 2 based on prior rating history' "Whether a costs order should be granted relating to the adjournment and today's hearing"]
Ratio Decidendi
No evidentiary basis was established to warrant a departure from the application of the s 94 contributions plan; the full contribution as reflected in condition 79 is imposed. A costs order of $435 is appropriate for today's proceedings due to inadequate evidence leading to adjournment, subject to the concurrence of the Acting Chief Judge.
Court Disposition
Application for variation of s 94 contribution dismissed; condition 79 imposed unvaried; partial costs order granted in favour of respondent for today's hearing, subject to judicial concurrence.
Orders
- ['Condition 79 of the conditions of consent for Lot 2 imposed unvaried.' "Applicant to pay costs of $435 to Ku-ring-gai Council for today's proceedings, subject to concurrence of Acting Chief Judge."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment