Jordan v Tsang [2019] NSWCATAP 128
The Appeal Panel found no error of law, no actual or apprehended bias, and determined the Tribunal's factual findings and assessment of damages were open on the evidence. The appellants were not deprived of procedural fairness, nor was the decision against the weight of evidence or not fair and equitable. Leave to appeal was refused and the appeal dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal (residential Tenancy) / Appeal Leave to Appeal and Merits
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['procedural Fairness' 'bias' 'fair and Equitable' 'against the Weight of Evidence' 'damages Assessment' 'appeals Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal (residential Tenancy) / Appeal Leave to Appeal and Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was procedural fairness and absence of bias in the initial Tribunal hearing' 'Whether the Tribunal erred in assessing property condition and depreciation' "Whether the Tribunal erred in awarding damages based on the landlord's renovation plans" 'Whether findings of fact were unsupported by evidence' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted on the basis that the decision was against the weight of evidence or not fair and equitable']
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Panel found no error of law, no actual or apprehended bias, and determined the Tribunal's factual findings and assessment of damages were open on the evidence. The appellants were not deprived of procedural fairness, nor was the decision against the weight of evidence or not fair and equitable. Leave to appeal was refused and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal refused' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment