R N B Property Group v Waverley Council [2024] NSWLEC 1259
The Court approved the modification application because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3), and the Commissioner was satisfied the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions: the modification was substantially the same development as originally approved, involved only minor ground floor alterations within the approved building envelope with marginal additional floor space and minimal additional adverse impact, notification and submissions requirements were met, relevant planning controls and BASIX requirements were addressed, and the conditions captured the additional floor area in a Planning Agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Modification Application to Modify a Court Granted Development Consent for Shop Top Housing / Final Orders Following Agreement Reached at a Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Application granted; Modification Application DA/296/2019/D approved.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'shop Top Housing' 'conciliation Conference Agreement' 'floor Space Ratio' 'basix Compliance' 'voluntary Planning Agreement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Modification Application to Modify a Court Granted Development Consent for Shop Top Housing / Final Orders Following Agreement Reached at a Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court could approve Modification Application DA/296/2019/D under s 4.55(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 pursuant to s 4.55(2).' 'Whether the development as modified would be substantially the same development as originally approved.' 'Whether notification and consideration of submissions requirements under s 4.55(2)(c) and s 4.55(2)(d) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 were met.' 'Whether the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court approved the modification application because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3), and the Commissioner was satisfied the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions: the modification was substantially the same development as originally approved, involved only minor ground floor alterations within the approved building envelope with marginal additional floor space and minimal additional adverse impact, notification and submissions requirements were met, relevant planning controls and BASIX requirements were addressed, and the conditions captured the additional floor area in a Planning Agreement.
Court Disposition
Application granted; Modification Application DA/296/2019/D approved.
Orders
- ['The application is granted.' 'Pursuant to section 4.55(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Modification Application DA/296/2019/D for amendment to the ground floor level including creation of an additional commercial space at 97 Glenayr Avenue Bondi Beach, NSW 2106 in the terms set out in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment