R & N Holdings Pty Ltd v Cooper [2008] NSWSC 225

R & N Holdings Pty Ltd v Cooper [2008] NSWSC 225

The plaintiffs failed to discharge the onus of proof to establish that loans were made to Kelloheal Pty Ltd; there was no evidence the company received the funds or recorded the debts, and the arrangements asserted were implausible or possibly unlawful.

Parties
Plaintiff: R & N Holdings Pty Limited; Plaintiff: Raquel Angelica Quinones; Defendant: Mark Fraser Cooper
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Liquidator's Rejection of Proofs of Debt / Judgment
Outcome
Appeals dismissed; costs awarded against plaintiffs on indemnity basis
Legal Topics
Winding Up, Proof of Debt, Appeal Against Liquidator's Rejection, Burden of Proof, Corporations Act 2001 (cth) S 1321

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R & N Holdings Pty Limited

Plaintiff

Raquel Angelica Quinones

Plaintiff

Mark Fraser Cooper

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal Against Liquidator's Rejection of Proofs of Debt / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the liquidator erred in rejecting the plaintiffs' proofs of debt in the winding up of Kelloheal Pty Ltd
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs discharged the onus of proof to establish the debts

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiffs failed to discharge the onus of proof to establish that loans were made to Kelloheal Pty Ltd; there was no evidence the company received the funds or recorded the debts, and the arrangements asserted were implausible or possibly unlawful.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed; costs awarded against plaintiffs on indemnity basis

Orders

  • Appeals against rejection of proofs of debt dismissed
  • Plaintiffs to pay defendant's costs on an indemnity basis