R v Paivinen [1985] HCA 39
The non-parole period fixed for an offender convicted in the Australian Capital Territory and imprisoned in New South Wales is not subject to statutory reduction under the New South Wales Parole Act; therefore, it is erroneous for the sentencing judge to increase the non-parole period on the basis of the New South Wales provisions, as they do not apply. The proper law is the Parole Ordinance 1976 (ACT).
- Parties
- Applicant: R; Respondent: Paivinen
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Special leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Non Parole Periods, Remission of Sentences, Imprisonment in Another State, Application of Parole Legislation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Applicant
Paivinen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a judge of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory can fix a non-parole period by taking into account the operation of the New South Wales Parole Act and regulations when the offender is to serve the sentence in New South Wales.
- 2 Whether the provisions of the New South Wales Parole Act apply to an offender convicted in the Australian Capital Territory and serving sentence in New South Wales by operation of removal statutes.
Ratio Decidendi
The non-parole period fixed for an offender convicted in the Australian Capital Territory and imprisoned in New South Wales is not subject to statutory reduction under the New South Wales Parole Act; therefore, it is erroneous for the sentencing judge to increase the non-parole period on the basis of the New South Wales provisions, as they do not apply. The proper law is the Parole Ordinance 1976 (ACT).
Court Disposition
Special leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- Special leave to appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment