RA No 7 Pty Ltd (ABN 600 896 624) v Waverley Council [2023] NSWLEC 1776
The Court was satisfied, on the evidence, observations on site and the parties' agreed jurisdictional statement, that the s 4.55(2) jurisdictional prerequisites were met, there was no jurisdictional impediment to the proposed orders, and the parties' agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. Section 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 therefore required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.9 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 From the Deemed Refusal of Modification Application DA 152/2021/b / Orders Following Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Modification Application DA-152/2021/B approved subject to terms and consolidated modified conditions of consent.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' 'residential Flat Building' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'jurisdictional Prerequisites' 'basix']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.9 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 From the Deemed Refusal of Modification Application DA 152/2021/b / Orders Following Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court could approve Modification Application DA-152/2021/B under s 4.55(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' 'Whether the proposed modification was substantially the same development as the development for which consent was originally granted.' 'Whether notification and consideration of submissions requirements were satisfied.' "Whether the parties' agreement was a decision the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied, on the evidence, observations on site and the parties' agreed jurisdictional statement, that the s 4.55(2) jurisdictional prerequisites were met, there was no jurisdictional impediment to the proposed orders, and the parties' agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. Section 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 therefore required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Modification Application DA-152/2021/B approved subject to terms and consolidated modified conditions of consent.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' "Modification application DA-152/2021/B of a residential flat building including alteration of internal layout, front and rear extension and open space reconfiguration at land identified as 154 Ramsgate Avenue, North Bondi NSW, being Lot 1 in Section 10 in DP786, is approved subject to the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment