Matar v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1917
Section 48 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), read with reg 2.12 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), precludes the applicant from applying for a visitor visa due to the absence of a substantive visa and previous refusal. Compelling or compassionate circumstances are legally irrelevant to the validity of the application, and no jurisdictional error or denial of natural justice is made out. No merit exists in the proposed appeal grounds.
- Parties
- Applicant: Raad Matar; Respondent: Minister for Home Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal From a Federal Circuit Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Visa Applications, Jurisdictional Error, Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Compelling and Compassionate Circumstances, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raad Matar
Applicant
Minister for Home Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal From a Federal Circuit Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant’s visitor visa application was invalid under s 48 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
- 2 Whether compelling and compassionate circumstances or natural justice grounds can overcome statutory bars to visa applications
- 3 Whether leave and an extension of time to appeal should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
Section 48 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), read with reg 2.12 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), precludes the applicant from applying for a visitor visa due to the absence of a substantive visa and previous refusal. Compelling or compassionate circumstances are legally irrelevant to the validity of the application, and no jurisdictional error or denial of natural justice is made out. No merit exists in the proposed appeal grounds.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
- The applicant pay the costs of the respondent, to be taxed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment