Rabremo Pty Ltd v Brewarrina Shire Council [2022] NSWLEC 1050
The parties agreed to revocation of the Development Control Order and dismissal of the appeal, the relevant jurisdictional requirements were resolved, and the Court was satisfied on the evidence that there were no jurisdictional impediments to revocation under s 8.18(4)(f) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Because the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against a Development Control Order (stop Use) / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and Agreement Between the Parties
- Outcome
- The appeal was dismissed, the Development Control Order was revoked, and no costs were ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Control Order' 'stop Use Order' 'irrigation Earthworks' 'conciliation Conference' 'revocation of Order' 'class 1 Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against a Development Control Order (stop Use) / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and Agreement Between the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Development Control Order (Stop Use) No 788.2 2021 should be revoked pursuant to s 8.18(4)(f) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' "Whether the Court could dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreed decision under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979."]
Ratio Decidendi
The parties agreed to revocation of the Development Control Order and dismissal of the appeal, the relevant jurisdictional requirements were resolved, and the Court was satisfied on the evidence that there were no jurisdictional impediments to revocation under s 8.18(4)(f) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Because the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision.
Court Disposition
The appeal was dismissed, the Development Control Order was revoked, and no costs were ordered.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'Development Control Order (Stop Work Order) No 788.2 2021 issued on 9 July 2021 and served on Rabremo Pty Ltd, pursuant to s 9.35 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, is revoked pursuant to s 8.18(4)(f).' 'No costs are ordered with the intention that each party pay...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment