Rowlands v Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal (No 2) [2003] NSWSC 731
The Tribunal's refusal to grant a rehearing is set aside on the plaintiff's undertaking to file an affidavit, and an undertaking is provided by the landlord not to evict pending completion of rehearing.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Rachel Rowlands; 1st Defendant: Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal; 2nd Defendant: Daniel Nott
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Law Prerogative Writ / Interlocutory; Ex Tempore Judgment Setting Aside Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Order made setting aside Tribunal's determination denying a rehearing
- Legal Topics
- Prerogative Writs, Rehearing Application, Injunctions, Termination of Tenancy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rachel Rowlands
Plaintiff
Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal
1st Defendant
Daniel Nott
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law Prerogative Writ / Interlocutory; Ex Tempore Judgment Setting Aside Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal's refusal to grant a rehearing of the order for termination of tenancy made in absence of plaintiff should be set aside
- 2 Whether an injunction should be ordered to prevent eviction pending rehearing
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's refusal to grant a rehearing is set aside on the plaintiff's undertaking to file an affidavit, and an undertaking is provided by the landlord not to evict pending completion of rehearing.
Court Disposition
Order made setting aside Tribunal's determination denying a rehearing
Orders
- First defendant’s decision dated 5 August 2003 not to grant a rehearing is set aside
- Second defendant undertakes not to evict the plaintiff until the rehearing’s completion
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment