Rowlands v Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal [2003] NSWSC 730
Because it was open to argument that Ms Rowlands was denied procedural fairness in the Tribunal's refusal to rehear the matter, the Court granted an order requiring the Tribunal to show cause why prerogative relief should not issue.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Law Application for Prerogative Relief Concerning Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Orders / Order Nisi Granted; Show Cause Ordered
- Outcome
- Order nisi granted
- Legal Topics
- ['prerogative Writs and Orders' 'consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal' 'termination of Tenancy' 'rehearing Application' 'procedural Fairness' 'privative Clause']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law Application for Prerogative Relief Concerning Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Orders / Order Nisi Granted; Show Cause Ordered
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal's refusal to rehear the tenancy matter arguably denied Ms Rowlands procedural fairness." 'Whether the privative provision in Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001, s 65(1) prevented relief, or whether the exception in s 65(3) for denial of procedural fairness could apply.' 'Whether an order nisi in the nature of prohibition, mandamus, certiorari or other relief should be granted.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because it was open to argument that Ms Rowlands was denied procedural fairness in the Tribunal's refusal to rehear the matter, the Court granted an order requiring the Tribunal to show cause why prerogative relief should not issue.
Court Disposition
Order nisi granted
Orders
- ['The Tribunal show cause before Gzell J at 10am on Friday 8 August 2003 why a judgment or order in the nature of prohibition, mandamus, certiorari or other relief should not be issued forthwith.' 'Notice of the order be given in the first instance by telephone by the Associate to the Tribunal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment