Wall v Barham [2017] NSWCATAP 61
The appellant failed to establish denial of procedural fairness, failure to hear or consider her claims, inadequacy of reasons, or any error regarding rent arrears or water usage findings. Directions and timetable accorded procedural fairness, evidence was considered and findings open to the Tribunal. No significant new evidence arose. Grounds for leave not established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Merits Decision
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal is refused. Appeal is dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['procedural Fairness' 'rental Arrears' 'water Charges' 'adequacy of Reasons' 'appeal Leave Requirements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Merits Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether refusal to give appellant an extension of time to prepare documents constitutes a denial of procedural fairness' 'Whether Tribunal refused to hear the appellant on her applications' 'Whether Tribunal gave adequate reasons for dismissal of claims' 'Whether findings on rent arrears and water charges were against the weight of evidence or not fair and equitable' 'Whether significant new evidence had arisen for the purposes of appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to establish denial of procedural fairness, failure to hear or consider her claims, inadequacy of reasons, or any error regarding rent arrears or water usage findings. Directions and timetable accorded procedural fairness, evidence was considered and findings open to the Tribunal. No significant new evidence arose. Grounds for leave not established.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal is refused. Appeal is dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal is refused.' 'Appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment