Louise v DailyMail.com Australia Pty Ltd [2014] NSWDC 177
Imputations 4(a) and 4(b) are inconsistent and must be pleaded in the alternative; imputations 4(e), 6(c), and 6(d) are vague, ambiguous, or rhetorical and should be struck out; only those imputations that are sufficiently clear and capable of being conveyed to an ordinary reader will go to the jury.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Pleadings and Capacity/strike Out Objections
- Outcome
- Orders made regarding the form of pleadings and striking out of certain imputations
- Legal Topics
- ['defamation' 'imputations' 'pleading' 'strike Out Application']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Pleadings and Capacity/strike Out Objections
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether certain pleaded imputations are reasonably capable of being conveyed to the ordinary reasonable reader' 'Whether certain imputations are defective in form or ambiguous and should be struck out' 'Whether inconsistent imputations can be pleaded together or only as alternatives']
Ratio Decidendi
Imputations 4(a) and 4(b) are inconsistent and must be pleaded in the alternative; imputations 4(e), 6(c), and 6(d) are vague, ambiguous, or rhetorical and should be struck out; only those imputations that are sufficiently clear and capable of being conveyed to an ordinary reader will go to the jury.
Court Disposition
Orders made regarding the form of pleadings and striking out of certain imputations
Orders
- ['Imputations 4(a) and 4(b) are to be pleaded in the alternative and will go to the jury.' 'Imputations 4(c), 4(d), 6(a) and 6(b) will go to the jury.' 'Imputations 4(e), 6(c) and 6(d) are struck out.' 'Plaintiff to file and serve Amended Statement of Claim in 14 days.' 'Matter stood over to the Defamation List on...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment