Radio Corporation Pty Ltd v Bear [1961] HCA 26

Radio Corporation Pty Ltd v Bear [1961] HCA 26

The November 1956 arrangement did re-vest title to the stock in the appellant and discharge part of Cowan's debt, thereby giving the appellant a preference and causing an act of bankruptcy on 30 November 1956 with relation back under s. 90. However, because the goods were not in fact taken from the bankrupt, put into the appellant's beneficial possession or excluded from the bankrupt's business operations, s. 95 did not make the appellant liable to pay their value of £1,282 16s. 0d. The evidence did not safely establish the amount, if any, repayable for dealings and receipts after 30 November 1956, so an inquiry and account were required.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Appeal / Appeal From an Order of the Federal Court of Bankruptcy Made Upon the Application of Trustees of a Bankrupt Estate
Outcome
Appeal allowed; part of the Federal Court of Bankruptcy order set aside; declaration made that the appellant was not liable under s. 95 to pay £1,282 16s. 0d.; inquiry and account ordered as to post-30 November 1956 dealings; cause remitted to the Federal Court of Bankruptcy.
Legal Topics
['void Preferences' 'acts of Bankruptcy' 'relation Back of Bankruptcy' 'consignment Account' 'sale or Return' "trustees' Recovery of Payments"]

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy Appeal / Appeal From an Order of the Federal Court of Bankruptcy Made Upon the Application of Trustees of a Bankrupt Estate

  1. 1 ['Whether the arrangement of 27 November 1956 and related ledger entries re-vested ownership of stock in the appellant company and gave it a preference, priority or advantage within s. 95 of the Bankruptcy Act 1924-1955.' 'Whether that preference constituted an act of bankruptcy under s. 52(c) and caused the bankruptcy to commence on 30 November 1956 by virtue of s. 90.' "Whether the appellant was liable to pay £1,282 16s. 0d. to the trustees under s. 95 where the goods were not taken out of the bankrupt's hands or put into the appellant's beneficial possession." 'Whether sums credited or paid after 30 November 1956 were repayable to the trustees under the doctrine of relation back and, if so, in what amount.']

Ratio Decidendi

The November 1956 arrangement did re-vest title to the stock in the appellant and discharge part of Cowan's debt, thereby giving the appellant a preference and causing an act of bankruptcy on 30 November 1956 with relation back under s. 90. However, because the goods were not in fact taken from the bankrupt, put into the appellant's beneficial possession or excluded from the bankrupt's business operations, s. 95 did not make the appellant liable to pay their value of £1,282 16s. 0d. The evidence did not safely establish the amount, if any, repayable for dealings and receipts after 30 November 1956, so an inquiry and account were required.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; part of the Federal Court of Bankruptcy order set aside; declaration made that the appellant was not liable under s. 95 to pay £1,282 16s. 0d.; inquiry and account ordered as to post-30 November 1956 dealings; cause remitted to the Federal Court of Bankruptcy.

Orders

  • ['Costs of appellant to be paid out of assets of bankrupt estate subject to any prior charges.' 'Costs of respondent trustees of the bankrupt estate as between solicitor and client to be paid or retained out of the assets of the bankrupt estate.' 'Set aside so much of the order of the Federal Court of Bankruptcy as...