Alam v Burwood Council [2023] NSWLEC 1180
The appeal is upheld and the terms of the Development Control Order are modified to allow reconstruction of the heritage item in accordance with the parties’ agreement, as the parties’ decision is one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under relevant statutes.
- Parties
- Applicant: Radwan Alam; Respondent: Burwood Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Orders Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld and Development Control Order modified
- Legal Topics
- Development Control Order, Heritage Conservation, Modification of Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Radwan Alam
Applicant
Burwood Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Orders Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Order should be modified given unauthorised works on heritage-listed item
- 2 Whether the appeal against the Development Control Order should be upheld
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and the terms of the Development Control Order are modified to allow reconstruction of the heritage item in accordance with the parties’ agreement, as the parties’ decision is one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under relevant statutes.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld and Development Control Order modified
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Pursuant to s 8.18(4)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Court modifies the terms of the Development Control Order, General Order No 10, issued to the Applicant on 27 April 2023 by the Respondent in relation to 48 Fitzroy Street, Burwood, as set out at Annexure A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment