Rae Cottle v Northern Beaches Council [2016] NSWLEC 1346
Where the parties have reached an agreement that the Court is satisfied it could have made, the Court must make orders in accordance with the agreement pursuant to s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld by consent orders made at conciliation conference
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'court Approved Agreement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the conciliated agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 was acceptable to the parties and could be made by the Court.']
Ratio Decidendi
Where the parties have reached an agreement that the Court is satisfied it could have made, the Court must make orders in accordance with the agreement pursuant to s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld by consent orders made at conciliation conference
Orders
- ["The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans as identified in Condition 1 of Annexure 'A'." 'The appeal is upheld.' "Development application N0005/16 for demolition of existing dwelling and construction of a new dwelling and swimming pool at 13 Malo Road, Whale Beach is approved subject to the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment