Regina v R.A.F. [2000] NSWSC 672
Given the offender's youth, rehabilitation prospects, history of non-compliance, and need for post-custodial supervision, a head sentence of two years and 37 weeks is imposed, with a non-parole period of one year and 11 weeks, both to commence on 4 July 2000; the entirety of the sentence is to be served in a detention centre pursuant to s 19 of the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'accessory After the Fact' 'murder' 'children (criminal Proceedings)' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for a young person convicted as accessory after the fact to murder' 'Determination of special circumstances justifying parole apportionment' 'Appropriateness of detention centre order']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender's youth, rehabilitation prospects, history of non-compliance, and need for post-custodial supervision, a head sentence of two years and 37 weeks is imposed, with a non-parole period of one year and 11 weeks, both to commence on 4 July 2000; the entirety of the sentence is to be served in a detention centre pursuant to s 19 of the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced
Orders
- ['Imprisonment for 2 years and 37 weeks from 4 July 2000' 'Non-parole period fixed at 1 year and 11 weeks from 4 July 2000' 'Pursuant to s 19 of the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987, the whole sentence to be served in a detention centre' "Registrar to provide Dr Canaris' report to Director-General of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment