Toscana v Wedge Industries Pty Ltd [2003] NSWIRComm 260
On the material before the Commission, a sufficient evidentiary basis has been established for joining Mr Robert Dye, given his apparent connection with the impugned contract and potential for substantive relief; leave to amend is granted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Raffaele Antonio Toscano; First Respondent: Wedge Industries Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Robert Dye
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Motion Under Industrial Relations Act 1996 S106 / Application to Amend Proceedings to Join Additional Respondent
- Outcome
- Leave granted to amend proceedings and join Mr Robert Dye as second respondent. Costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Contract, Joinder of Parties, Amendment of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raffaele Antonio Toscano
Applicant
Wedge Industries Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Robert Dye
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Motion Under Industrial Relations Act 1996 S106 / Application to Amend Proceedings to Join Additional Respondent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to amend proceedings to join Mr Robert Dye as second respondent
- 2 Sufficiency of connection between proposed respondent and impugned contract
Ratio Decidendi
On the material before the Commission, a sufficient evidentiary basis has been established for joining Mr Robert Dye, given his apparent connection with the impugned contract and potential for substantive relief; leave to amend is granted.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to amend proceedings and join Mr Robert Dye as second respondent. Costs reserved.
Orders
- Leave to amend summons granted to join Mr Robert Dye as respondent.
- Costs reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment