Rahmani v Ku-ring-gai Council [2004] NSWLEC 595
On the basis of heritage considerations, including the house's significance as a prototype and contributor to a group of listed heritage items, its architectural importance, and the coordinated nature of the group, the level of significance is sufficient to warrant retention of No. 27 Richmond Avenue. The application for demolition and dual occupancy is refused.
- Parties
- Applicant: Rahmani S; Respondent: Ku-ring-gai Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Dual Occupancy, Heritage Significance, Streetscape Impact, Development Consent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rahmani S
Applicant
Ku-ring-gai Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the existing dwelling house at 27 Richmond Avenue, St Ives, has sufficient heritage significance to warrant its retention
- 2 Whether the proposed dual occupancy development would adversely impact the streetscape, particularly the building line
Ratio Decidendi
On the basis of heritage considerations, including the house's significance as a prototype and contributor to a group of listed heritage items, its architectural importance, and the coordinated nature of the group, the level of significance is sufficient to warrant retention of No. 27 Richmond Avenue. The application for demolition and dual occupancy is refused.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- Development Application No. 795/02 for demolition and erection of dual occupancy at 27 Richmond Avenue, St Ives, is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment