Railway 51 Pty Ltd v City of Parramatta Council [2023] NSWLEC 1745

The amended Development Application 880/2021 satisfies the jurisdictional and merit requirements for development consent, and as the parties' agreement is one the Court could make, consent is granted subject to conditions.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 07 December 2023
Procedural Posture: Class 1 Development Appeal / Determination Following Conciliation Conference
Outcome: Appeal upheld; development consent granted with conditions
Legal Topics: ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'residential Flat Building' 'development Consent' 'planning Law']

['planning and Environment'] ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'residential Flat Building' 'development Consent' 'planning Law']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Class 1 Development Appeal / Determination Following Conciliation Conference

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the amended Development Application 880/2021 satisfies the requirements for development consent under applicable planning instruments and statutes' 'Whether the Court can grant consent subject to agreed conditions following conciliation under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; development consent granted with conditions

Orders

['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application 880/2021 is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions in Annexure A.']

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.